4.5 Article

Mucoadhesive paclitaxel-loaded chitosan-poly (isobutyl cyanoacrylate) core-shell nanocapsules containing copaiba oil designed for oral drug delivery

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101194

Keywords

Mucoadhesion; Nanocapsules; Paclitaxel; Oral delivery; Poly(isobutyl cyanoacrylate); Chitosan; Copaiba oil

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-CAPES [COFECUB 721/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of drug delivery systems for potent anticancer drugs like paclitaxel remains a challenger. The aim of this work was to study the mucoadhesive properties of paclitaxel-loaded chitosan-poly (isobutyl cyanoacrylate) core-shell nanocapsules designed for oral drug delivery. Using an experimental design approach, the nanocapsules were produced and, then, physicochemically characterized. Mucoadhesion assays were performed in-vitro by the aggregation test with mucin and ex-vivo, in Ussing Chamber, using freshly excised rat intestinal mucosa. [3H]-paclitaxel dosages were carried out by liquid scintillation. Paclitaxel-loaded nanocapsules showed a mean hydrodynamic diameter of 470 nm with low polydispersity index and spherical form. Encapsulation efficiency and drug loading of paclitaxel were 74 +/- 1% and 1.70 +/- 0.02%, respectively. After drying, nanocapsules could be redispersed with no changes on their nanostructure. Dispersions of nanocapsules were stable in simulated gastric medium for 120 min, and after six months of storage at 4 degrees C. They showed interesting mucoadhesive properties with mucins and good association (9%) with the intestinal mucosa of the rat. Taking together, results from the present work are encouraging to pursue the development of chitosan-coated nanocapsules for oral delivery of paclitaxel as a new treatment for cancer with possible synergetic anticancer effect with the therapeutically active components found in copaiba oil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available