4.5 Article

When does habitat fragmentation matter? A biome-wide analysis of small mammals in the Atlantic Forest

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
Volume 46, Issue 12, Pages 2811-2825

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13730

Keywords

biodiversity loss; forest restoration; fragmentation threshold hypothesis; habitat amount hypothesis; habitat fragmentation per se; tropical forest

Funding

  1. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim While habitat loss is a primary driver of biodiversity declines worldwide, the role of habitat fragmentation per se is inconclusive, but likely depends on the amount of habitat left in a landscape. Here we aimed to tease apart the effects of habitat amount (percentage of native cover) and a fragmentation metric (number of fragments) on species richness and total abundance. Taxon Native small mammals. Location South American Atlantic Forest biome. Methods Small mammal species richness and abundance were obtained from a published database for 96 localities (groups of sampling sites). We then defined circular 100 km(2) landscapes centred on each locality. For each landscape, percentage of habitat cover and number of fragments were measured on time frames close to the sampling periods. Effects of habitat amount, fragmentation and their interaction were modelled considering all landscapes, and also within four classes of habitat cover: 0%-10%, 10%-30%, 30%-50%, and 50%-100%. Results Species richness was mainly affected by percentage of habitat cover, with a three-fold effect size compared to fragmentation. Yet, in landscapes with <10% or >= 50% of remaining cover, fragmentation positively affected species richness. Total species abundance also increased towards more fragmented landscapes. At the species level, three of the 20 species considered increased in abundance with fragmentation, while four species decreased. Main conclusion Percentage of habitat cover was the main driver of species richness when the entire cover range is considered, but the secondary effects of fragmentation were strong at the extreme ends of this range. Adding habitat patches in landscapes with low cover, or promoting habitat heterogeneity in landscapes with high cover, may boost species richness. However, further increases in species richness following fragmentation in high-cover landscapes are likely to correspond to disturbance-adapted species. In addition, such positive effects of fragmentation cannot be presumed to apply to all assemblages and species as some species are negatively affected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available