4.7 Article

Hydrothermal conversion of bamboo shoot shell to biochar: Preliminary studies of adsorption equilibrium and kinetics for rhodamine B removal

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2019.104694

Keywords

Biomass; Hydrothermal carbonization; Biochar; Adsorption; Rhodamine B

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506184]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ50597]
  3. Science & Technology Program of Hunan Province [2017XK2048]
  4. Teaching Reform Project on Postgraduate of XTU [YJG2018007]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy of Central South University
  6. Hunan 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Process with Environmental Benignity & Efficient Resource Utilization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrothermal carbonization is an efficient way in transforming biomass into hydrochar while most studies have been dedicated to bio-oil production with rare studies focusing on the use of hydrochar. Here, biochar was derived from hydrochar pyrolysis at various temperatures using agricultural waste of bamboo shoot shells as the raw materials, and the microstructure of biochar varied with temperature, and the removal performance for rhodamine B (RhB) at 0, 25, and 40 degrees C were studied in detail. The results indicated that BHC-800 obtained at pyrolysis temperature of 800 degrees C showed well-developed pores with surface area of 513 m(2)/g. Significantly, the maximum adsorption capacity of RhB on BHC-800 at 25 degrees C is up to 85.8 mg/g with isotherms fitted well to Freundlich model. Adsorption kinetics indicated that the adsorption equilibrium time for RhB on BHC-800 was of about 20 min with the data fitted better to the pseudo-second-order kinetics. This work indicated that biochar from the hydrochar pyrolysis holds promise as adsorbents to efficiently remove RhB dyes from water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available