4.7 Article

Rational design via tailoring Mo content in La2Ni1-xMoxO4+δ to improve oxygen permeation properties in CO2 atmosphere

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 806, Issue -, Pages 153-162

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.209

Keywords

Ruddlesden-popper oxide; Doping; Membrane; Oxygen permeation; CO2 resistance

Funding

  1. Joint Research and Development Program of Zibo City SDUT [2016ZBXC190]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2017GGX20133]
  3. Australian Research Council Discovery Project Program [DP160104937]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perovskite (ABO(3)) and ruddlesden-popper (A(2)BO(4)) oxides are typical mixed conducting ceramic membrane materials for oxygen separation from air. In particular, ruddlesden-popper (RP) membrane display high CO2 resistance despite their relative low oxygen permeation flux compared to perovskite oxide membranes. Element-doping is an important method to improve the oxygen permeability. In this work, the mechanism of oxygen transfer process through one RP ceramic La(2)Ni(1-x)MoxO(4+delta) (x = 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2) membranes was investigated. An optimum doping level (x = 0.05) in La2Ni1-xMoxO4+delta was found. The optimized composition of La2Ni0.95Mo0.05O4+delta membrane could not only improve surface oxygen exchange reactions, but also promote oxygen ion bulk diffusion through the dense layer. The maximum oxygen flux of La2Ni0.95Mo0.05O4+delta membrane reached 3.27mL min(-1) cm(-2) at 1000 degrees C. Furthermore, La2Ni0.95Mo0.05O4+delta membrane high stability in CO2 atmosphere. When sweeping gas was switched from helium to pure CO2, the oxygen fluxes were only reduced by 5% and stabilized at 2.75 mL min(-1) cm(-2) at 950 degrees C. Our results highlight the efficiency of Mo-doping strategy to simultaneously improve the oxygen permeability and stability of A(2)BO(4+delta)-type oxide membranes. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available