4.2 Article

Evaluation of diaphragm ultrasound in predicting extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients with COPD

Journal

IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 189, Issue 2, Pages 661-668

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-02117-1

Keywords

COPD; Diaphragm; Ultrasonography; Ventilator weaning

Funding

  1. Natural Science Research Project of the Higher Education in Anhui Province [KJ2016A730]
  2. Research Project on Application of Commonweal Technology in Anhui Province [1704f0804048]
  3. Annual Scientific and Technological Projects of Wuhu City [2012hm35]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background To explore the value of the right hemi-diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and its variation in predicting extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients with COPD. Methods All included patients with COPD received mechanical ventilation (MV) and were ready to wean from MV. After patients passed the 30 min spontaneous breathing trail (SBT), extubation was considered to be feasible, and the right DE measured by ultrasound at 0 min, 5 min, and 30 min of SBT were named as DE0, DE5, and DE30, respectively. Results Twenty-five patients succeeded extubation; 12 patients failed. The area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC(ROC)) of DE30 and Delta DE30-5 (the variation between 30 and 5 min) were 0.762 and 0.835; a cutoff value of DE30 > 1.72 cm and Delta DE30-5 > 0.16 cm were associated with a successful extubation with a sensitivity of 76% and 84%, a specificity of 75% and 83.3%, respectively. The predictive probability equation of the DE30 plus increment DE30-5 was P = 1/[1 + e(30-5)(30)(-(-5.625+17.689x increment DE)(+1.802xDE)())], a cutoff value of P > 0.626 was associated with a successful extubation with the AUC(ROC) of 0.867, a sensitivity of 92%, and a specificity of 83.3%. Conclusion The combination of DE30 and increment DE30-5 could improve the predictive value and could be used as the predictor of extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients with COPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available