4.7 Article

Learning on the Edge: Investigating Boundary Filters in CNNs

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION
Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages 773-782

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-019-01223-y

Keywords

Deep learning; Convolutional neural networks; Boundary rules; Boundary conditions

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie Grant [642841]
  2. ERC Starting Grant SmartGeometry [StG-2013-335373]
  3. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K023578/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/K023578/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) handle the case where filters extend beyond the image boundary using several heuristics, such as zero, repeat or mean padding. These schemes are applied in an ad-hoc fashion and, being weakly related to the image content and oblivious of the target task, result in low output quality at the boundary. In this paper, we propose a simple and effective improvement that learns the boundary handling itself. At training-time, the network is provided with a separate set of explicit boundary filters. At testing-time, we use these filters which have learned to extrapolate features at the boundary in an optimal way for the specific task. Our extensive evaluation, over a wide range of architectural changes (variations of layers, feature channels, or both), shows how the explicit filters result in improved boundary handling. Furthermore, we investigate the efficacy of variations of such boundary filters with respect to convergence speed and accuracy. Finally, we demonstrate an improvement of 5-20% across the board of typical CNN applications (colorization, de-Bayering, optical flow, disparity estimation, and super-resolution). Supplementary material and code can be downloaded from the project page: http://geometry.cs.ucl.ac.uk/projects/2019/investigating-edge/.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available