4.7 Article

Characterization of physicochemical and biological properties of Schizophyllum commune polysaccharide extracted with different methods

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 1425-1434

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.183

Keywords

Schizophyllum commune; Schizophyllan; Extraction methods

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801921, 31601806]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2018CFB188]
  3. Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences Foundation for Young Researchers [2017nkyjj04]
  4. Major Projects of Technological Innovation of Hubei Province [2017ABA148]
  5. Unveiling Technology Project of Hubei Province [2019-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water-soluble polysaccharides from Schizophyllum commune (SPGs) were extracted using different methods including hot-water extraction (HWE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UE), microwave-assisted extraction (ME) and high pressure extraction (HPE). The physicochemical characteristics, antioxidant activity and hypoglycemic activity of four different SPGs were investigated. The results indicated that the polysaccharides yield (8.26%), uronic add content (3.0%), total polysaccharides content (67.96%) and molecular weight (52.7 kDa) of SPGs extracted by HWE were higher than those obtained by other methods. FT-IR spectra and conformation information of four SPGs were similar, however, the color characteristics, the monosaccharide species and molar ratios, the solubility and micro-structure of each SPGs were significantly different. Though the molecular weight (11.0 kDa) of UE-SPGs was lowest, it showed the highest antioxidant activity and hypoglycemic activity. It could be considered that the UE extraction method might be a good potential extraction technique for the SPGs with high bioactivities. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available