4.6 Article

High-Temperature Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis of Light Olefins over Nano-Fe3O4@MnO2 Core-Shell Catalysts

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 47, Pages 21350-21362

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04221

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21706068]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Plan of China [2011AA05A204]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [222201917013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A one-pot hydrothermal process was adopted to synthesize nano-Fe3O4@MnO2 core-shell catalysts with diverse thicknesses of MnO2 for the high-temperature Fischer-Tropsch (HTFT) synthesis of light olefins. Herein, the effects of the Mn amount on the morphology and catalytic performance of the catalysts were evaluated by Ar adsorption-desorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), H-2 temperature-programmed reduction (H-2-TPR), H(2 )temperatureprogrammed desorption (H-2-TPD), CO temperature-programmed desorption (CO-TPD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)-lining, aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) combined with EDS-mapping, and Mossbauer spectroscopy. Both EDS-lining and EDS-mapping had verified the core-shell structure in the fresh samples. The core-shell structure benefited the reduction of Fe3O4, electron donation, and the CO dissociative adsorption while suppressing the hydrogenation reaction. The porous MnO2 shell inhibited the further growth and aggregation of the Fe species. Fe3O4@MnO2 showed the highest light olefin selectivity of 37.4% at a CO conversion of 91.8%. These results constitute a facile method for preparing Fe-based nanocatalysts applied in the HTFT synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available