4.3 Article

Evaluation of M1 and M2 macrophages in ovarian endometriomas from women affected by endometriosis at different stages of the disease

Journal

GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 441-444

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1683821

Keywords

Endometriosis; macrophages; endometriomas; inflammation; immunity

Funding

  1. University of Messina (CIP) [2014.IT.05.SFOP.014/3/10.5/9.2.02/0006]
  2. University of Messina (CUP) [G47E16000030009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease defined by the presence and growth of functional endometrial-like tissue, glands and stroma, outside the uterine cavity. Macrophages are broadly classified into pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, and M2 macrophages, which have selective anti-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic activities and are able to induce immunotolerance and angiogenesis. Based on these elements, the aim of our study was to evaluate CD14(+)CD68(+)CD197(+)CD80(+) M1 and CD14(+)CD68(+)CD163(+)CD206(+) M2 macrophages in tissue samples from ovarian endometriomas of women affected by endometriosis at different stages of the disease. For each patient, we collected a biological sample of the cyst (ovarian endometriomas for cases and ovarian functional cyst for controls) during laparoscopy. We found that the number of both M1 and M2 macrophages was significantly higher in endometriosis group than controls, regardless of stage (p < .0001 for each stage versus controls). Moreover, our data analysis shows a trend in progressive decrease of M1 macrophages from stage I to stage IV; on the contrary, M2 macrophages show a specular trend compared to M1 macrophages, with a progressive increase from stage I to stage IV. This may contribute to the pro-inflammatory microenvironment in the early stages of the disease, and to the pro-fibrotic activity of the advanced stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available