4.7 Article

Enzymatic in situ saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass in ionic liquids using an ionic liquid-tolerant cellulases

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 180-186

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.07.019

Keywords

Biomass; Ionic liquid; Pretreatment; Cellulase; Tolerance; Saccharification

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21406083]
  2. Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province [13KJB480001, 15KJD180006]
  3. Natural Science Youth Fund of Jiangsu Province [BK20130416, BK20150412]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ionic liquids (ILs) have been considered as a class of promising solvents that can dissolve lignocellulosic biomass and then provide enzymatic hydrolyzable holocellulose. However, most of available cellulases are completely or partially inactivated in even low concentrations of ILs. To more fully exploit the benefits of ILs to lignocellulose biorefinery, it is critical to improve the compatibility between cellulase and ILs. In this study, an IL-tolerant cellulase cocktail derived from Penicillium oxalicum GS was isolated from chemicals polluted microhabitats. High hydrolytic activity of the cellulase cocktail was detected in various ILs. In particular, the cellulase cocktail retained 91% initial activity in IL dimethylimidazolium methylphosphonate ([Dmim][(OCH3)(2)PO2]) (20%, w/v), which was effective in disrupting compact structures of rice straw. Furthermore, the cellulase cocktail even preserved 61% initial activity in 25% (w/v) [Dmim][(OCH3)(2)PO2] media. A compatible cellulase-IL system, which combines IL pretreatment and subsequent enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass into a single vessel, was then developed based on the cellulase cocktail and [Dmim][(OCH3)(2)PO2]. Its use significantly improved the saccharification rate of rice straw from 47% to 83% versus the control. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available