4.7 Article

Vapor-solid interaction among cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin

Journal

FUEL
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116681

Keywords

Biomass pyrolysis; Vapor-solid interaction; Cellulose; Hemicellulose; Lignin

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2018YFB1501403]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51622604, 51876061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Secondary reactions, including those caused by interactions between vapor and solid phases, are unavoidable during biomass pyrolysis. In this study, the vapor-solid interaction between biomass components (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) was investigated in a two-stage fixed-bed reactor. The results indicated that volatiles from hemicellulose promoted the breakdown of cellulose glycoside bonds and pyran rings as well as the removal of branched aliphatic chains and O-containing functional groups of lignin at 280 degrees C. Moreover, volatiles from cellulose produced abundant anhydrosugar, which was more prone to re-polymerization and to form aromatic rings on the lignin structure at 315 degrees C. As a result of the vapor-char interactions at 650 degrees C, the secondary decomposition of cellulose volatiles to gas products (decreasing by similar to 8 wt%) was inhibited, but carbonized products (increasing by similar to 3 wt%) tended to form, whereas hemicellulose vapor was more prone to decompose into low-molecular-weight liquid compounds, resulting in a high liquid yield (increasing by similar to 6 wt%). In addition, vapor-solid interactions accelerated the removal of O-containing functional groups of lignin volatiles, such as carbonyl and carboxyl, but inhibited the decomposition of H-containing functional groups, such as methyl and methylene. The finding is conducive to the understanding of the interactive mechanisms of biomass pyrolysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available