4.5 Article

Thermodynamic characterization of deep eutectic solvents at high pressures

Journal

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
Volume 500, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2019.112249

Keywords

Deep eutectic solvents; SAFT; Cholinium chloride; Density; Viscosity

Funding

  1. CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, FCT - national funds through the FCT/MCTES [UID/CTM/50011/2019]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/130870/2017, IF/00758/2015]
  3. Navigator Co. [SFRH/BDE/103257/2014]
  4. FCT
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BDE/103257/2014] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the large spectrum of applications being reported for DESs over the last decade, their thermodynamic characterization is often neglected, hindering a better understanding of their nature, and the development of accurate and robust thermodynamic models to describe them, essential for the conceptual and design stages of new industrial processes. This work aims at decreasing such a gap in literature by reporting new experimental density and viscosity data in wide temperature and pressure ranges for the three archetypal DESs of cholinium chloride, as hydrogen bond acceptor, combined with either ethylene glycol, glycerol, or urea, as hydrogen bond donor. The experimental data measured in this work were then correlated using the Perturbed Chain - Statistical Associating Fluid Theory equation of state coupled with the Free Volume Theory to assess the performance of existing coarse-grained models when applied to the description of DESs. The modelling results obtained highlight the limitation of the existing models, since a correct prediction of DES density could not be achieved, reinforcing the need for viable alternative approaches for the development of coarse-grained models that are appropriate for the thermodynamic modelling of DESs. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available