4.7 Article

Comparative proteomic investigation of Marsupenaeus japonicus hepatopancreas challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus and white spot syndrome virus

Journal

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 851-862

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.08.039

Keywords

WSSV; Vibrio parahaemolyticus; IBT; Marsupenaeus japonicas; Phagocytosis; Apoptosis

Funding

  1. Projects of International Exchange and Cooperation in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China-Science, Technology and Innovation Cooperation in Aquaculture with Tropical Countries
  2. Program of Shandong Leading Talent [LNJY2015002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to use isobaric tags (IBTs) to investigate the immune response of the hepatopancreas of Marsupenaeus japonicas infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus or white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and protein sequencing identified 1005 proteins. Among them, 109 proteins were upregulated and 94 were downregulated after V. parahaemolyticus infection. After WSSV infection, 130 proteins were identified as differentially abundant, including 88 that were upregulated and 42 were downregulated. Fifty-four proteins were identified as differentially abundant after both V. parahaemolyticus and WSSV infection. A number of proteins related to cytoskeletal processes, including actin and myosin, and apoptosis-related proteins were upregulated in shrimp after V. parahaemolyticus and WSSV infection, indicating that phagocytosis and apoptosis may be involved in the response to in V. parahaemolyticus or WSSV infection. Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out to verify the reliability of the proteomic data. These data provide a basis to characterize the immunity-related processes of shrimp in response to infection with WSSV or V. parahaemolyticus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available