A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2019-11-13
DOI
10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies
- (2019) Robert F. Wolff et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology
- (2019) Olaf M. Dekkers et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- OUP accepted manuscript
- (2018) Advances in Nutrition
- Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study
- (2018) Adriani Nikolakopoulou et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study
- (2018) Adriani Nikolakopoulou et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
- (2018) Jessica Gurevitch et al. NATURE
- Network meta-analysis explained
- (2018) Sofia Dias et al. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Association of alcohol consumption with the onset of natural menopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2016) Petek Eylul Taneri et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Use of Plant-Based Therapies and Menopausal Symptoms
- (2016) Oscar H. Franco et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews
- (2015) Melissa L. Rethlefsen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors
- (2013) Jill A. Hayden et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of systematic reviews for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure
- (2013) Aaron Conway et al. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE
- Identifying Trustworthy Experts: How Do Policymakers Find and Assess Public Health Researchers Worth Consulting or Collaborating With?
- (2012) Abby S. Haynes et al. PLoS One
- Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity
- (2009) Mohamed B. Elamin et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials
- (2009) Ned S. Abraham et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead
- (2008) Gerta Rücker et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Recent developments in meta-analysis
- (2007) Alexander J. Sutton et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started