Cardiologists’ and patients’ views about the informed consent process and their understanding of the anticipated treatment benefits of coronary angioplasty: a survey study
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Cardiologists’ and patients’ views about the informed consent process and their understanding of the anticipated treatment benefits of coronary angioplasty: a survey study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 147451511987905
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2019-11-28
DOI
10.1177/1474515119879050
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Surgical consent practice in the UK following the Montgomery ruling: A national cross-sectional questionnaire study
- (2018) Chris McKinnon et al. International Journal of Surgery
- Percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease
- (2018) Rasha K Al-Lamee et al. HEART
- Evidence on the effectiveness of health literacy interventions in the EU: a systematic review
- (2018) Boudewijn B. Visscher et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- In-Hospital Risk-Adjusted Mortality Poorly Reflects PCI Quality
- (2017) Michael McDaniel JACC-Cardiovascular Interventions
- Quality and Health Literacy Demand of Online Heart Failure Information
- (2017) Maan Isabella Cajita et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
- Changes in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Deemed “Inappropriate” by Appropriate Use Criteria
- (2017) Edward L. Hannan et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Percutaneous coronary intervention patients’ and cardiologists’ experiences of the informed consent process in Northern England: a qualitative study
- (2017) Joy Probyn et al. BMJ Open
- Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?
- (2017) Sarah W Chan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?
- (2017) Sarah W Chan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU)
- (2015) Kristine Sørensen et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Percutaneous coronary intervention in the UK: recommendations for good practice 2015
- (2015) Adrian P Banning et al. HEART
- Evidence-Based Risk Communication
- (2014) Daniella A. Zipkin et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Congruence between patients’ preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature
- (2014) Linda Brom et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Doctors’ perspectives of informed consent for non-emergency surgical procedures: a qualitative interview study
- (2014) Fiona Wood et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Variation in patients' perceptions of elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease: cross sectional study
- (2014) F. Kureshi et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Patients' and Cardiologists' Perceptions of the Benefits of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Disease
- (2013) Michael B. Rothberg ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Importance of clarifying patients' desired role in shared decision making to match their level of engagement with their preferences
- (2013) M. C. Politi et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
- (2012) Glyn Elwyn et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- (2011) Paul S. Chan et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started