4.2 Article

Deciphering the role of epigenetics in self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes

Journal

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106163

Keywords

Self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes; Epigenetics; Monozygotic twins

Funding

  1. Financial Markets Foundation for Children [2013-207]
  2. Queensland Health Research Fellowship
  3. University of Queensland Mayne Bequest Funds
  4. Royal Brisbane and Women's Foundation Grant
  5. Viertal-Charitable Foundation
  6. Ramaciotti Establishment Grant
  7. Servier Barry Young Fellowship in Neurology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aetiology of self-limited epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes (SECTS) remains controversial and a strong genetic basis has long been presumed. The discordant monozygotic twin (MZ) model controls for shared genetic and environmental factors, enabling focus on the potential role of the non-shared environment. Methods: DNA methylation data was acquired from DNA extracted from three discordant MZ twin pairs, from both new born blood spots before epilepsy onset, and blood samples taken after epilepsy onset. An epigenome-wide analysis was performed, using the Illumina Infinium EPIC array. Differentially methylated regions (DMR) were identified using the bumphunter package in R. Comparative analyses were undertaken at the two different time points as well as a combined analysis independent of time. Results: Many of the top DMR-associated genes have previously been described in neurodevelopmental disorders. The LYPD8 gene was associated with a top-ranked DMR both at birth and across the two time points. Conclusion: We have demonstrated the novel utility of the longitudinal, discordant MZ twin model, to facilitate a deeper appreciation of the complex neurobiology of SECTS. The genetic architecture of SECTS is complex and is likely to involve an interplay between genes and environment, in part mediated by epigenetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available