4.5 Article

State-Of-Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Battery Using Improved DUKF Based on State-Parameter Separation

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12214036

Keywords

lithium-ion batteries; SoC estimation; state-parameter separation; improved dual unscented Kalman filter

Categories

Funding

  1. Vehicle Power System Lab of School of Automotive Engineering, Chongqing University
  2. Vehicle Inspection Research Institute of Chongqing
  3. Chongqing Baizhuan Technology Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

State-of-charge estimation and on-line model modification of lithium-ion batteries are more urgently required because of the great impact of the model accuracy on the algorithm performance. This study aims to propose an improved DUKF based on the state-parameter separation. Its characteristics include: (1) State-Of-Charge (SoC) is treated as the only state variable to eliminate the strong correlation between state and parameters. (2) Two filters are ranked to run the parameter modification only when the state estimation has converged. First, the double polarization (DP) model of battery is established, and the parameters of the model are identified at both the pulse discharge and long discharge recovery under Hybrid Pulse Power Characterization (HPPC) test. Second, the implementation of the proposed algorithm is described. Third, combined with the identification results, the study elaborates that it is unreliable to use the predicted voltage error of closed-loop algorithm as the criterion to measure the accuracy of the model, while the output voltage obtained by the open-loop model with dynamic parameters can reflect the real situation. Finally, comparative experiments are designed under HPPC and DST conditions. Results show that the proposed state-parameter separated IAUKF-UKF has higher SoC estimation accuracy and better stability than traditional DUKF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available