4.7 Article

4′-Phosphopantetheine corrects CoA, iron, and dopamine metabolic defects in mammalian models of PKAN

Journal

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201910489

Keywords

4 '-phosphopantetheine; coenzyme A; NBIA; PANK2; PKAN

Funding

  1. NIH [R21HD088833, R01NS109083]
  2. NBIA Disorders Association
  3. Friends of Doernbecher
  4. OCTRI Biomedical Innovation Program
  5. Collins Foundation
  6. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR0002369]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) is an inborn error of CoA metabolism causing dystonia, parkinsonism, and brain iron accumulation. Lack of a good mammalian model has impeded studies of pathogenesis and development of rational therapeutics. We took a new approach to investigating an existing mouse mutant of Pank2 and found that isolating the disease-vulnerable brain revealed regional perturbations in CoA metabolism, iron homeostasis, and dopamine metabolism and functional defects in complex I and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Feeding mice a CoA pathway intermediate, 4 '-phosphopantetheine, normalized levels of the CoA-, iron-, and dopamine-related biomarkers as well as activities of mitochondrial enzymes. Human cell changes also were recovered by 4 '-phosphopantetheine. We can mechanistically link a defect in CoA metabolism to these secondary effects via the activation of mitochondrial acyl carrier protein, which is essential to oxidative phosphorylation, iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis, and mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis. We demonstrate the fidelity of our model in recapitulating features of the human disease. Moreover, we identify pharmacodynamic biomarkers, provide insights into disease pathogenesis, and offer evidence for 4 '-phosphopantetheine as a candidate therapeutic for PKAN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available