4.3 Article

Effect of empagliflozin on brachial artery shear stress and endothelial function in subjects with type 2 diabetes: Results from an exploratory study

Journal

DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1479164119883540

Keywords

Empagliflozin; blood viscosity; rheology; shear stress; endothelial function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Empagliflozin reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality in subjects with type 2 diabetes. We demonstrated that empagliflozin increases blood viscosity and carotid shear stress and decreases carotid wall thickness. Shear stress is the force acting on the endothelial surface and modulates arterial function. The current study evaluates the influence of empagliflozin on brachial artery shear stress and endothelial function compared to incretin-based therapy. The study is a nonrandomized, open, prospective cohort study including 35 subjects with type 2 diabetes administered empagliflozin or incretin-based therapy. Shear stress was calculated with a validated formula, and endothelial function was evaluated using the flow-mediated dilation technique. Both treatments resulted in comparable reductions in blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin. Brachial artery shear stress significantly increased exclusively in the empagliflozin group (61 +/- 20 vs 68 +/- 25 dynes/cm(2), p = 0.04), whereas no significant difference was detected in the incretin-based therapy group (60 +/- 20 vs 55 +/- 12 dynes/cm(2), p = not significant). Flow-mediated dilation significantly increased in the empagliflozin group (4.8 +/- 4.5% vs 8.5 +/- 5.6%, p = 0.03). Again, no change was detected in the incretin-based therapy group (5.1 +/- 4.5% vs 4.7 +/- 4.7%, p = not significant). The present findings demonstrate the beneficial effect of empagliflozin on shear stress and endothelial function in subjects with type 2 diabetes independent of the hypoglycaemic effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available