4.4 Review

Diagnosis and pathologic characteristics of medullary thyroid carcinoma-review of current guidelines

Journal

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 338-344

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3747/co.26.5539

Keywords

Medullary thyroid carcinoma; MEN2; diagnosis; calcitonin; carcinoembryonic antigen; RET; amyloid; hyperparathyroidism; pheochromocytoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare malignancy of the thyroid gland, and raising awareness of the recommended diagnostic workup and pathologic characteristics of this malignancy is therefore important. Methods We reviewed the current clinical practice guidelines and recent literature on MTC, and here, we summarize the recommendations for its diagnosis and workup. We also provide an overview of the pathology of MTC. Results A neuroendocrine tumour, MTC arises from parafollicular cells (C cells), which secrete calcitonin. As part of the multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 2 syndromes, MTC can occur sporadically or in a hereditary form. This usually poorly delineated and infiltrative tumour is composed of solid nests of discohesive cells within a fibrous stroma that might also contain amyloid. Suspicious nodules on thyroid ultrasonography should be assessed with fine-needle aspiration (FNA). If a diagnosis of MTC is made on FNA, patients require baseline measurements of serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen. Calcitonin levels greater than 500 pg/mL or clinical suspicion for metastatic disease dictate the need for further imaging studies. All patients should undergo DNA analysis for RET mutations to diagnose men type 2 syndromes, and if positive, they should be assessed for possible pheochromocytoma and hyperparathyroidism. Summary Although the initial diagnosis of a suspicious thyroid nodule is the same for differentiated thyroid carcinoma and MTC, the remainder of the workup and diagnosis for MTC is distinct.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available