4.6 Article

An integrated rule based intrusion detection system: analysis on UNSW-NB15 data set and the real time online dataset

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-019-03008-x

Keywords

Intrusion detection system; Signature based; Attack detection rate; False alarm rate; Integrated rule based model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intrusion detection system (IDS) has been developed to protect the resources in the network from different types of threats. Existing IDS methods can be classified as either anomaly based or misuse (signature) based or sometimes combination of both. This paper proposes a novel misuse based intrusion detection system to detect five categories such as: Exploit, DOS, Probe, Generic and Normal in a network. Further, most of the related works on IDS are based on KDD99 or NSL-KDD 99 data set. These data sets are considered obsolete to detect recent types of attacks and have no significance. In this paper UNSW-NB15 data set is considered as the offline dataset to design own integrated classification based model for detecting malicious activities in the network. Performance of the proposed integrated classification based model is considerably high compared to other existing decision tree based models to detect these five categories. Moreover, this paper generates its own real time data set at NIT Patna CSE lab (RTNITP18) which acts as the working example of proposed intrusion detection model. This RTNITP18 dataset is considered as a test data set to evaluate the performance of the proposed intrusion detection model. The performance analysis of the proposed model with UNSW-NB15 (benchmark data set) and real time data set (RTNITP18) shows higher accuracy, attack detection rate, mean F-measure, average accuracy, attack accuracy, and false alarm rate in comparison to other existing approaches. Proposed IDS model acts as the dog watcher to detect different types of threat in the network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available