4.6 Article

A perspective on the extension of research-based information to orchard management decision-makers: Lessons learned and potential future directions

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 121-127

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.11.013

Keywords

Biological control; Outreach; Technology adoption; Agricultural practices; Integrated pest management; Tree fruit and nuts

Funding

  1. Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission [2008-04854]
  2. Washington State Commission on Pesticide Registration [2008-04854]
  3. California Walnut Board [2008-04854]
  4. Hood River (Oregon) Pear Growers [2008-04854]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A central element of the Specialty Crop Research Initiative (SCRI) on 'enhancing biological control in western orchards' was to disseminate research-based information generated by the project for adoption and implementation by decision-makers. As the landscape of publicly supported extension and outreach has been changing, our goal was to employ effective and timely strategies that would provide a legacy of project information at relatively low costs. We used various approaches to develop a regional outreach program spanning three states, four institutions, and three crops. Guided by an advisory panel of stakeholders and scientists, our approaches included a simulcast short course, interactive workshops, online media, as well as presentations and print articles. Inevitably, we had to overcome certain challenges and here we share our perspective on the successes, constraints and lessons learned during development and implementation of the project's outreach program. Finally, we consider future directions and strategies that will aid Cooperative Extension in continuing to meet the needs of western tree fruit and nut industries while optimizing available resources. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available