4.6 Article

Endophytic bacteria with antagonistic traits inhabit the wood tissues of grapevines from Tunisian vineyards

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 28-37

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.04.005

Keywords

Bacterial communities; Grapevine Trunk Diseases; Plant protection; Fingerprinting method; Wood necrosis

Funding

  1. CMCU [13G0924]
  2. French Ministry in charge of Agriculture (Casdar program) [V1302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vineyards throughout the world, including Tunisia, are being attacked by Grapevine Trunk Diseases (GTDs) such as Esca and Botryosphaeriae dieback. In this study, the bacterial microflora colonizing the non-necrotic and necroticwood tissues of Tunisian mature grapevines (cv Muscat d'Italie) was investigated. Both types of tissues were studied in order to decipher microbial communities associated with them and to find a suitable BCA that can be applied to the Tunisian terroir. Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism (SSCP) analyses showed that complex bacterial communities specifically colonized both types of wood tissues. The 19 most abundant cultivable strains, selected on their morphology, were isolated from plant samples and assigned to Pantoea, Pseudomonas, Curtobacterium and Bacillus species based on the 16S rRNA and rpoB genes. Biochemical and microbiological screenings revealed that those 19 strains (i) metabolized differently carbon sources, even within the same species, (ii) possessed antibiotic genes, (iii) produced siderophores and solubilized phosphates and (iv) had an in vitro antagonistic effect against 3 fungal pathogens (Lasidiodiplodia pseudotheobromae, Neofusicoccum parvum and Schizophyllum commune) involved in GTDs. One strain, Bacillus subtilis B6, had a positive effect on young vines of a cultivar, Muscat d'Italie, frequently planted in Tunisia, by reducing the size of the wood necrosis caused by N. parvum, showing its potential to counteract infection caused by this GTDs agent. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available