4.6 Article

Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Cyclohexane by Cu vs Pd Clusters: Selectivity Control by Specific Cluster Dynamics

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1307-1315

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201901795

Keywords

cluster dynamics; cyclohexane oxidative dehydrogenation; deposited clusters; selectivity control; size-selected subnanometer clusters

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, BES Materials Sciences [DEAC02-06CH11357]
  2. UChicago Argonne, LLC
  3. US DOE, Scientific User Facilities [DEAC02-06CH11357]
  4. AFOSR [FA9550-16-1-0141]
  5. US DOE-BES [DE-SC0019152]
  6. DOD
  7. UCLA Dissertation Fellowship
  8. European Union [810310]
  9. XSEDE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supported subnanometer clusters can exhibit catalytic properties not observed in their bulk analogues. Partially-oxidized Pd and Cu clusters are reported to catalyze the oxidative dehydrogenation of cyclohexane with high activity, and with distinctly different selectivity, producing primarily benzene or cyclohexene, respectively. Under the appliedreaction conditions, the structure and oxidation state of the two catalysts evolve differently, which leads to either the desorption of the cyclohexene intermediate or to its deeper dehydrogenation. Under the applied reaction conditions, the initially oxidized Pd and Cu clusters undergo partial reduction, which we show to be required for the selectivity to emerge. Both systems also have thermal access to multiple distinct structural forms yielding statistical ensembles. The structures within these ensembles evolve with the changing nature of the bound reaction intermediates differently for the two metals; the evolution is found pronounced in the Cu clusters, but only modest in Pd. Ultimately, the different selectivity observed experimentally for the Cu versus Pd clusters is controlled by differences in the collective structural and redox dynamics of their ensembles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available