4.8 Article

Freezing/melting of water in the confined nanospace of carbon materials: Effect of an external stimulus

Journal

CARBON
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 346-355

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.081

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MINECO [MAT2016-80285-p]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [PROM-ETEOII/2014/004]
  3. H2020 (MSCA-RISE-2016/NanoMed Project)
  4. Spanish ALBA synchrotron [2018022707, 2019023322]
  5. Oak Ridge beam time availability [IPTS-20843.1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Freezing/melting behavior of water confined in the nanopores of activated carbon materials has been evaluated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at different water loadings, and after the application of an external stimulus. Under atmospheric pressure conditions, the DSC scans show a depression in the freezing/melting point of confined water compared to the bulk system. Interestingly, water confined in narrow micropores (pores below 0.7 nm) does not exhibit any phase transition, i.e. it is non-freezable water. Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) data confirm the presence of a distorted molecular assembly in narrow micropores, whereas synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data (SXRPD) demonstrate the non-freezable nature of the water confined in these narrow-constrictions. Similar experiments under high-pressure CH4 give rise to a completely different scenario. Under high-pressure conditions methane hydrates are formed with a water-to-hydrate yield of 100% for the under-saturated and saturated samples, i.e. in the presence of an external stimulus even water in narrow micropores is prone to experience a liquid-to-solid phase transition. These results confirm the beneficial role of carbon as a host structure to promote nucleation and growth of methane hydrates with faster kinetics and a higher yield compared to the bulk system and to other porous materials. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available