4.6 Article

The associations among lead exposure, bone mineral density, and FRAX score: NHANES, 2013 to 2014

Journal

BONE
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115045

Keywords

Bone mineral density; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES); Osteoporosis; Lead

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lead exposure has been suspected as a risk factor for osteoporosis. However, in epidemiological studies, the association between environmental lead exposure and bone health were inconsistent. With the decrease of lead exposure in recent decades, we evaluated the association between lead exposure and bone mineral density (BMD) in the general US population in this study. We analyzed data on 1859 adults (aged >= 40 years) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted in 2013-2014 to determine the relationship among lead exposure measured by both blood and urine lead concentration, BMD of total spine and femur, and FRAX score in a cross-sectional study. In premenopausal women, the results showed a 1-unit increase in natural log-transformed blood and urine lead levels was associated with a decrease in total femur BMD of 0.061 g/cm(2) (S.E. = 0.015; p = 0.001) and 0.046 g/cm(2) (S.E. = 0.018; p = 0.020), respectively. Moreover, in premenopausal women, a 1-unit increase in natural log-transformed blood level was associated with a decrease in total spine BMD of 0.054 g/cm(2) (S.E. = 0.019; p = 0.013). Both FRAX scores were positively correlated with blood and urine lead levels in subjects without fractures, while the 10-year hip fracture risk score was positively associated with lead exposure in subjects with a history of fracture or vertebral fracture. In conclusion, lead exposure was associated with decreased total femur and spine BMD, and FRAX score in the general US population. Further research is needed to elucidate the causal relationship among lead exposure, BMD, and fracture risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available