BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2019-10-23
DOI
10.1186/s12874-019-0829-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study
- (2018) Adriani Nikolakopoulou et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study
- (2018) Adriani Nikolakopoulou et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Deficiencies in addressing effect modification in network meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological survey
- (2017) Bruno Kovic et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology
- (2016) Orestis Efthimiou et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- (2015) Brian Hutton et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009
- (2014) Andrew W. Lee JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement
- (2014) Brian Hutton et al. PLoS One
- Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages
- (2014) Binod Neupane et al. PLoS One
- Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility of Modeling Studies for Informing Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report
- (2014) J. Jaime Caro et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Indirect Treatment Comparison/Network Meta-Analysis Study Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility to Inform Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report
- (2014) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
- (2014) A. Bafeta et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers
- (2013) Jeroen P Jansen et al. BMC Medicine
- Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions
- (2013) A. A. Veroniki et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Assessing key assumptions of network meta-analysis: a review of methods
- (2013) Sarah Donegan et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Automating network meta-analysis
- (2012) Gert van Valkenhoef et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1
- (2011) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality
- (2010) Sarah Donegan et al. PLoS One
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More