Shape complementarity and hydrogen bond preferences in protein–protein interfaces: implications for antibody modeling and protein–protein docking
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Shape complementarity and hydrogen bond preferences in protein–protein interfaces: implications for antibody modeling and protein–protein docking
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 32, Issue 16, Pages 2451-2456
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2016-04-20
DOI
10.1093/bioinformatics/btw197
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Updates to the Integrated Protein–Protein Interaction Benchmarks: Docking Benchmark Version 5 and Affinity Benchmark Version 2
- (2015) Thom Vreven et al. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- The Origin of CDR H3 Structural Diversity
- (2015) Brian D. Weitzner et al. STRUCTURE
- Origins of specificity and affinity in antibody–protein interactions
- (2014) Hung-Pin Peng et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Cation-π, amino-π, π-π, and H-bond interactions stabilize antigen-antibody interfaces
- (2014) Georgios A. Dalkas et al. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
- SAbDab: the structural antibody database
- (2013) James Dunbar et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- IgBLAST: an immunoglobulin variable domain sequence analysis tool
- (2013) Jian Ye et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Local Network Patterns in Protein-Protein Interfaces
- (2013) Qiang Luo et al. PLoS One
- ABangle: characterising the VH-VL orientation in antibodies
- (2013) J. Dunbar et al. PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
- Antigen–antibody interface properties: Composition, residue interactions, and features of 53 non-redundant structures
- (2012) Thiruvarangan Ramaraj et al. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEINS AND PROTEOMICS
- A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds
- (2012) P. Benjamin Stranges et al. PROTEIN SCIENCE
- The association of heavy and light chain variable domains in antibodies: implications for antigen specificity
- (2011) Anna Chailyan et al. FEBS Journal
- Antibody modeling assessment
- (2011) Juan C. Almagro et al. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
- Adhesive water networks facilitate binding of protein interfaces
- (2011) Mazen Ahmad et al. Nature Communications
- Geometric Similarities of Protein–Protein Interfaces at Atomic Resolution Are Only Observed within Homologous Families: An Exhaustive Structural Classification Study
- (2010) Akira R. Kinjo et al. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- Analysis and prediction of VH/VL packing in antibodies
- (2010) K. R. Abhinandan et al. PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
- Comparison of protein-protein interactions in serine protease-inhibitor and antibody-antigen complexes: Implications for the protein docking problem
- (2010) Richard M. Jackson PROTEIN SCIENCE
- Energy-Based Analysis and Prediction of the Orientation between Light- and Heavy-Chain Antibody Variable Domains
- (2009) Arjun Narayanan et al. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
- (2008) Ozlem Keskin et al. CHEMICAL REVIEWS
- Targeting and tinkering with interaction networks
- (2008) Robert B Russell et al. Nature Chemical Biology
- Structural classification of CDR-H3 revisited: A lesson in antibody modeling
- (2008) Daisuke Kuroda et al. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
- Protein–protein interaction and quaternary structure
- (2008) Joël Janin et al. QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started