4.4 Article

Promotion of a quality standard for Porana sinensis Hemsl. based on the efficacy-oriented Effect-Constituent Index

Journal

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4726

Keywords

analysis of absorbed components; Effect-Constituent Index; Porana sinensis; QAMS; spectrum-effect relationship

Funding

  1. Xi'an Science and Technology Bureau Projects [201805103YX11SF37 [17]]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi [2019SF302]
  3. Shaanxi-Youth Science and Technology Star Plan [2018KJXX-073]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81603264]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multicompound determination for the quality control of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may often be inadequate, since these compounds may not be associated with, or fully represent, the clinical effects of TCM. Moreover, the individual contributions of each constituent to the pharmacological effect are often not considered. In China, Porana sinensis is widely used as a substitute for Erycibe sources to treat joint pain and rheumatoid arthritis. The existing quality control methods for P. sinensis neither consider the individual contributions of various compounds nor control the actual quality associated with different clinical efficacies. In the present study, a novel efficacy-oriented approach, named the effect-constituent index (ECI), was established for P. sinensis. Analyses of the spectrum-effect relationship and components in rat plasma were conducted to systematically and scientifically select quality markers. Quantitative analysis of multicomponents via a single marker method was introduced to enhance the practical application value of the established ECI. The established ECI shows a good ability to distinguish and predict the bioeffect-based quality of P. sinensis. The present study also provides a reference for the establishment and application of ECI as a quality control method for TCMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available