4.4 Article

Antitumor activity of a hydrogel loaded with lipophilic bismuth nanoparticles on cervical, prostate, and colon human cancer cells

Journal

ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 251-259

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000863

Keywords

antitumor activity; biocompatibility; bismuth nanoparticles; cancer chemotherapy; cervical cancer; colon cancer; hydrogel; prostate cancer

Funding

  1. Sectorial Fund for Education Research, CONACyT [CB 2017-2018, A1-S-20148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to analyze the antitumor activity of a hydrogel loaded with lipophilic bismuth nanoparticles on human cervical, prostate, and colon cancer cell lines. The effect of lipophilic bismuth nanoparticles on the viability of cancer cell lines (HeLa, DU145, and HCT-116) and non-cancer lung fibroblasts (HLF; LL 47[MaDo]) was determined with the MTT cell viability assay and compared with known antineoplastic drugs. The biocompatibility at an organismal level was verified in a murine model by histological examination. A lipophilic bismuth nanoparticle hydrogel at 50 mu M time-dependently inhibited the growth of the three cancer cell lines, in a time-dependent way. A 1-hour exposure to 250 mu M lipophilic bismuth nanoparticle hydrogel, inhibited the growth of the three cancer cell lines. The in-vitro efficacy of lipophilic bismuth nanoparticle was similar to the one of docetaxel and cisplatin, but without inhibiting the growth of non-cancer control cells. Histology confirmed the biocompatibility of lipophilic bismuth nanoparticles as there were no signs of cytotoxicity or tissue damage in any of the evaluated organs (kidney, liver, brain, cerebellum, heart, and jejunum). In conclusion, a lipophilic bismuth nanoparticle hydrogel is an innovative, low-cost alternative for the topical treatment of cervicouterine, prostate, and colon human cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available