4.6 Article

A Walking Intervention to Increase Weekly Steps in Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages 488-496

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Kidney Fund
  2. National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. International Society of Nephrology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale & Objective: Patients receiving dialysis report very low physical activity. We implemented a pilot trial to assess the feasibility of a pedometer-based intervention to gather preliminary evidence about its impact on physical activity, symptoms, and surrogates of cardiovascular risk. Study Design: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting & Participants: 60 dialysis patients from San Francisco dialysis clinics. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receiving pedometers with weekly step goals or usual care for 3 months. Outcomes: The primary outcome was step counts, measured using pedometers. Secondary outcomes included physical performance using the Short Physical Performance Battery, the Physical Function and Vitality scales of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, the Dialysis Symptoms Index, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, with endothelial function as a secondary and heart rate variability as an exploratory surrogate measure of cardiovascular risk. Targeted enrollment was 50% and targeted completion was 85%. Results: 49% of approached patients were enrolled, and 92% completed the study. After 3 months, patients randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 30) increased their average daily steps by 2,256 (95% CI, 978-3,537) more than the 30 controls (P < 0.001). Heart rate variability (standard deviation of N-N intervals) increased by 14.94 (95% CI, 0.31-33.56) milliseconds in the intervention group as compared with controls (P = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences across intervention groups in symptoms, physical performance, or endothelial function. Participants in the intervention group reverted to baseline steps during the post-intervention follow-up. Limitations: The Northern California study setting may limit generalizability. Walking does not capture the full spectrum of physical activity. Conclusions: A short-term pedometer-based intervention led to increased step counts in dialysis patients, but the increase was not sustained. Pedometer-based interventions are feasible for dialysis patients, but future studies are needed to address whether more prolonged interventions can improve physical function or symptoms

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available