4.7 Review

Systematic review with meta-analysis: association of vitamin D status with clinical outcomes in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 50, Issue 11-12, Pages 1146-1158

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.15506

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent among patients with IBD, however, data on its association with clinical outcomes are conflicting. Aim To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the association of low vitamin D status with clinical outcomes in patients with IBD. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to February 2018 for observational studies evaluating the association of low 25(OH)D status on IBD disease activity, mucosal inflammation, clinical relapse and quality of life. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled and analysed using a random effects model. Results Twenty-seven studies were eligible for inclusion comprising 8316 IBD patients (3115 ulcerative colitis, 5201 Crohn's disease). Among IBD patients, low 25(OH)D status was associated with increased odds of disease activity (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.32-1.77, I-2 = 0%), mucosal inflammation (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06-1.47, I-2 = 0%), low quality of life (QOL) scores (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.60, I-2 = 0%) and future clinical relapse (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.47, I-2 = 0%). In subgroup analysis, low vitamin D status was associated with Crohn's disease activity (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.36-2.03, I-2 = 0%), mucosal inflammation (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.85, I-2 = 0%), clinical relapse (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.59, I-2 = 0%), and low QOL scores (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.50, I-2 = 0%) and ulcerative colitis disease activity (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03-2.09, I-2 = 0%) and clinical relapse (OR 1.20, 95% 1.01-1.43, I-2 = 0%). Conclusions Low 25(OH)D status is a biomarker for disease activity and predictor of poor clinical outcomes in IBD patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available