4.3 Article

Growth of metallic delafossite PdCoO2 by molecular beam epitaxy

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.093401

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. BES Computational Materials Sciences Program
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program (x-ray diffraction) of Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  4. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's EPiQS Initiative [GBMF4418]
  5. QuantumEmX award from ICAM
  6. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF5305]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Pd- and Pt-based ABO(2) delafossites are a unique class of layered, triangular oxides with two-dimensional electronic structure and a large conductivity that rivals the noble metals. Here, we report successful growth of the metallic delafossite PdCoO2 by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). The key challenge is controlling the oxidation of Pd in the MBE environment where phase segregation is driven by the reduction of PdCoO2 to cobalt oxide and metallic palladium. This is overcome by combining low-temperature (300 degrees C) atomic layer-by-layer MBE growth in the presence of reactive atomic oxygen with a postgrowth high-temperature anneal. Thickness dependence (5-265 nm) reveals that in the thin regime (<75 nm), the resistivity scales inversely with thickness, likely dominated by surface scattering; for thicker films, the resistivity approaches the values reported for the best bulk crystals at room temperature, but the low-temperature resistivity is limited by structural twins. This work shows that the combination of MBE growth and a postgrowth anneal provides a route to creating high-quality films in this interesting family of layered, triangular oxides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available