4.7 Article

Stabilizing Effect of High Pore Fluid Pressure on Slip Behaviors of Gouge-bearing Faults

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 124, Issue 9, Pages 9526-9545

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JB018002

Keywords

rock deformation; gouge friction; dilatant hardening; pore pressure; rate and state friction; slow slips

Funding

  1. Department of Energy, Office of Science
  2. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division [DE-FG-0207ER15916]
  3. National Science Foundation [EAR-1761912, EAR-1452339]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted experiments to investigate the influence of pore fluid pressure on the frictional strength and slip behavior of gouge bearing faults. Saw cut porous sandstone samples with a layer of gouge powders placed between the precut surfaces were deformed in the conventional triaxial loading configuration. A series of velocity-step tests were performed to measure the response of the friction coefficient to variations in sliding velocity. Pore volume changes were monitored during shearing of the gouge. Our results demonstrate that under constant effective pressure, increasing pore pressure stabilizes the frictional slip of faults with all four gouge materials including antigorite, olivine, quartz, and chrysotile. The stabilizing effect is the strongest in antigorite gouge, which shows an evolution of friction parameters from velocity-weakening toward velocity-strengthening behavior with increasing pore pressure. Experiments with controlled pore volume show that the pore volume reduction diminishes under high pore fluid pressures, implying an increasing dilation component at these conditions. The dilatant hardening mechanism can explain the observed strengthening. These results provide a possible explanation to the observed spatial correlation between slow slip events and high pore pressure in many subduction zones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available