4.2 Review

Genomics and biochemistry of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY-MOSCOW
Volume 81, Issue 13, Pages 1650-1668

Publisher

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S0006297916130046

Keywords

wine; yeast strains; diversity; artificial selection; stress response; evolution; comparative genomics; metagenomics; microbial interactions; flor yeast; adhesion; aromatic compounds; gene regulation; strain improvement

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-16-00109]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [16-16-00109] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Saccharomyces yeasts have been used for millennia for the production of beer, wine, bread, and other fermented products. Long-term unconscious selection and domestication led to the selection of hundreds of strains with desired production traits having significant phenotypic and genetic differences from their wild ancestors. This review summarizes the results of recent research in deciphering the genomes of wine Saccharomyces strains, the use of comparative genomics methods to study the mechanisms of yeast genome evolution under conditions of artificial selection, and the use of genomic and postgenomic approaches to identify the molecular nature of the important characteristics of commercial wine strains of Saccharomyces. Succinctly, data concerning metagenomics of microbial communities of grapes and wine and the dynamics of yeast and bacterial flora in the course of winemaking is provided. A separate section is devoted to an overview of the physiological, genetic, and biochemical features of sherry yeast strains used to produce biologically aged wines. The goal of the review is to convince the reader of the efficacy of new genomic and postgenomic technologies as tools for developing strategies for targeted selection and creation of new strains using classical and modern techniques for improving wine-making technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available