4.6 Article

Thermal Analysis and Stability of Boron/Potassium Nitrate Pyrotechnic Composition at 180 °C

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app9173630

Keywords

boron/potassium nitrate; thermal analysis; high temperature stability; energetic material

Funding

  1. Beijing Space Vehicle General Design Department

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aerospace missions require that pyrotechnic compositions are able to withstand 180 degrees C. Therefore, this paper studies the thermal stability and output performance of boron/potassium nitrate (abbreviated BPN) used in pyrotechnic devices. Firstly, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric (TG) tests are used to analyze the thermal reaction process of KNO3, boron, and BPN to qualitatively judge their thermal stability. Then, apparent morphology analysis, component analysis, and the p-t curve test, which is the closed bomb test to measure the output power of the pyrotechnic composition, are carried out with BPN samples before and after the high-temperature test to verify BPN stability at 180 degrees C. The weight change of boron powder caused by chemical reactions occurs above 500 degrees C. When the temperature is lower than the peak exothermic temperature of decomposition, no obvious chemical reaction occurs with KNO3, and only physical changes (crystal transformation and melting) occur. Combined with a verification test at 180 degrees C for two days, it is concluded that boron and KNO3 components are stable at 180 degrees C. With an increase in boron content, the thermal stability of BPN is improved, with the best performance achieved when the ratio is 25:75 (B:KNO3). BPN samples without binder have the best thermal stability. In a test at 180 degrees C for five days, the binder affects the weight loss and p-t curve of BPN, and BPN with fluororubber binder is better than BPN with unsaturated polyester binder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available