4.4 Article

Structural Basis of the Substrate Range and Enantioselectivity of Two (S)-Selective ω-Transaminases

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue 31, Pages 4422-4431

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00370

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [KBBE-245144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

omega-Transaminases are enzymes that can introduce an amino group in industrially interesting compounds. We determined crystal structures of two (S)-selective omega-transaminases, one from Arthrobacter sp. (Ars-omega TA) and one from Bacillus megaterium (BM-omega TA), which have 95% identical sequences but somewhat different activity profiles. Substrate profiling measurements using a range of (R)- and (S) -substrates showed that both enzymes have a preference for substrates with large, flat cyclic side groups, for which the activity of BM-omega TA is generally somewhat higher. BM-omega TA has a preference for (S)-3,3-dimethyl-2-butylamine significantly stronger than that of Ars-omega TA, as well as a weaker enantiopreference for 1-cyclopropylethylamine. The crystal structures showed that, as expected for (S) -selective transaminases, both enzymes have the typical transaminase type I fold and have spacious active sites to accommodate largish substrates. A structure of BM-omega TA with bound (R)-alpha-methylbenzylamine explains the enzymes' preference for (S) -substrates. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments revealed that the presence of a tyrosine, instead of a cysteine, at position 60 increases the relative activities on several small substrates. A structure of Ars-omega TA with bound L-Ala revealed that the Arg442 side chain has been repositioned to bind the L-Ala carboxylate. Compared to the arginine switch residue in other transaminases, Arg442 is shifted by six residues in the amino acid sequence, which appears to be a consequence of extra loops near the active site that narrow the entrance to the active site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available