4.1 Article

Centrifuge study on effect of installation method on lateral response of monopiles in sand

Journal

Publisher

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/jphmg.19.00013

Keywords

foundations; offshore engineering; piles & piling

Funding

  1. Lloyd's Register Foundation
  2. Fugro chair in Geotechnics
  3. Shell EMI chair in Offshore Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper discusses the installation methods and research on monopiles used as foundations for offshore wind turbines, focusing on the interaction between monopiles and soil under lateral loading, as well as quantifying the effects of different installation methods on the axial response of monopiles.
Monopiles used as foundations for offshore wind turbines can be installed using different methods including jacking, vibratory driving and impact driving. Significant research efforts have been dedicated to the characterisation of monopile-soil interaction under lateral loading, mainly using p-y curves. There has also been extensive research in quantifying the effect of different installation methods on the axial response using numerical modelling and physical modelling techniques. Little attention has been paid to the effect of the installation method on the subsequent lateral response of a monopile under the in-service condition. In this paper, a purpose-designed apparatus is described that allows in-flight installation using different installation methods followed directly by lateral loading without stopping the centrifuge and thus retaining the installation-induced stress state. Test results from three lateral loading tests are discussed, with the piles either jacked at 1g and Ng or impact driven at Ng into a dry medium dense sand, allowing the effect of the installation method on the initial stiffness and ultimate capacity to be examined. The successfully conducted tests illustrate the capabilities of the new apparatus for centrifuge testing of laterally loaded driven piles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available