Journal
SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11174785
Keywords
chemicals denial; science denial; doubt; manufacturing uncertainty; chemicals; risk; policy; environmental goals
Funding
- Swedish Research Council FORMAS [211-2014-595]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Much research shows that science denial regarding climate change is widespread and problematic for science and scientists, as well as for policy-makers. Climate denial delays goal achievement. As shown in this article, science denial commonly occurs also in the field of chemicals assessment and policy, but the research on the topic is scarce. The peer-reviewed studies that exist mostly concern a limited number of specific cases, such as DDT, CFCs and endocrine disrupting chemicals. The characteristics of chemicals denial' show similarity with those of climate denial, including reliance on fake experts, cherry-picked facts and attacks on scientists, with a key aspect being the questioning of causal relationships. Considering the gaps between chemicals policy goals and the state of the environment, further scientific exploration in the field is needed. Developing a better coordinated research agenda and a common terminology are therefore warranted strategies. A key concept in such endeavors could be chemicals denial'.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available