4.2 Article

Serum Levels of Angiogenic Factors Distinguish Between Women with Preeclampsia and Normotensive Pregnant Women But Not Severity of Preeclampsia in an Obstetric Center in Turkey

Journal

MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR
Volume 25, Issue -, Pages 6924-6931

Publisher

INT SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, INC
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.915092

Keywords

Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study aimed to compare serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the VEGF receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, free placental growth factor (fPGF), endostatin, and serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) levels in women with mild and severe preeclampsia and healthy pregnant women. Material/Methods: A included patients diagnosed with mild preeclampsia (n=32), severe preeclampsia (n=32), and healthy pregnant women (n=24). Serum levels of VEGF-A, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, fPGF, endostatin, and PAPP-A levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: In women with mild and severe preeclampsia, the gestation age at birth and birth weight were found to be significantly lower than the control group (p<0.001). Serum levels of endostatin, VEGFR-1, and VEGF-A levels were significantly increased in pregnant women with preeclampsia compared with healthy pregnant women (p<0.001). Serum levels of PAPP-A, VEGFR-2, and fPGF were significantly higher in healthy pregnant women when compared with women with preeclampsia (p=0.024, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively), but there were no significant differences between women with mild and severe preeclampsia. Conclusions: Reduced serum levels of the angiogenic factors PAPP-A, VEGFR-2, and fPGF distinguished between women with preeclampsia and normotensive pregnant women but did not significantly distinguish between mild and severe preeclampsia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available