Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review
Authors
Keywords
Cervical cancer, Cervical cancer screening, Barriers, Facilitators, Uganda
Journal
BMC Womens Health
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2019-08-09
DOI
10.1186/s12905-019-0809-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Knowledge, facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a qualitative study
- (2017) Rawlance Ndejjo et al. BMJ Open
- Resources Required for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- (2016) Nicole G. Campos et al. PLoS One
- Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Factors among Women in Rural Uganda: A Cross Sectional Study
- (2016) Rawlance Ndejjo et al. PLoS One
- The acceptability of self-sampled screening for HPV DNA: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2016) Erik J Nelson et al. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS
- Beliefs, perceptions and health-seeking behaviours in relation to cervical cancer: a qualitative study among women in Uganda following completion of an HPV vaccination campaign
- (2016) Olivia Topister Hasahya et al. Global Health Action
- Cervical cancer prevention and treatment research in Africa: a systematic review from a public health perspective
- (2016) Sarah Finocchario-Kessler et al. BMC Womens Health
- Determinants of Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Services at a No-Cost Reproductive Health Clinic Managed by Nurse-Midwives
- (2015) Charles P. Osingada et al. CANCER NURSING
- Understanding the Low Level of Cervical Cancer Screening in Masaka Uganda Using the ASE Model: A Community-Based Survey
- (2015) Cyprian Twinomujuni et al. PLoS One
- Acceptability of self-collection sampling for HPV-DNA testing in low-resource settings: a mixed methods approach
- (2014) Pooja Bansil et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- Cervical Cancer Screening: The Complex Interplay of Medical Infrastructure, Society, and Culture
- (2014) A. Goodman et al. ONCOLOGIST
- Understanding the role of embarrassment in gynaecological screening: a qualitative study from the ASPIRE cervical cancer screening project in Uganda
- (2014) Flora F Teng et al. BMJ Open
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Mind the gaps: a qualitative study of perceptions of healthcare professionals on challenges and proposed remedies for cervical cancer help-seeking in post conflict northern Uganda
- (2013) Amos D Mwaka et al. BMC Family Practice
- Screen-and-Treat Approach to Cervical Cancer Prevention Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid and Cryotherapy: Experiences, Perceptions, and Beliefs From Demonstration Projects in Peru, Uganda, and Vietnam
- (2013) P. Paul et al. ONCOLOGIST
- Acceptability of cervical cancer screening via visual inspection with acetic acid or Lugol's iodine at Mulago Hospital, Uganda
- (2012) Priscilla Busingye et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- Assessing women's willingness to collect their own cervical samples for HPV testing as part of the ASPIRE cervical cancer screening project in Uganda
- (2011) Sheona Mitchell et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool
- (2011) Reema Sirriyeh et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started