4.6 Article

Antibiotic drug rifabutin is effective against lung cancer cells by targeting the eIF4E-β-catenin axis

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.02.120

Keywords

Rifabutin; eIF4E; beta-catenin; Lung cancer; Drug repositioning

Funding

  1. Hainan General Hospital [309083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The essential roles of overexpression of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and aberrant activation of P-catenin in lung cancer development have been recently identified. However, whether there is a direct connection between eIF4E overexpression and beta-catenin activation in lung cancer cells is unknown. In this study, we show that antibiotic drug rifabutin targets human lung cancer cells via inhibition of eIF4E-beta-catenin axis. Rifabutin is effectively against lung cancer cells in in vitro cultured cells and in vivo xenograft mouse model through inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis. Mechanistically, eIF4E regulates D-catenin activity in lung cancer cells as shown by the increased beta-catenin phosphorylation and activity in cells overexpressing elF4E, and furthermore that the regulation is dependent on phosphorylation at S209. Rifabutin suppresses eIF4E phosphorylation, leads to decreased beta-catenin phosphorylation and its subsequent transcriptional activities. Depletion of eIF4E abolishes the inhibitory effects of rifabutin on P-catenin activities and overexpression of beta-catenin reverses the inhibitory effects of rifabutin on cell growth and survival, further confirming that rifabutin acts on lung cancer cells via targeting eIF4E-beta-catenin axis. Our findings identify the eIF4E-beta-catenin axis as a critical regulator of lung cancer cell growth and survival, and suggest that its pharmacological inhibition may be therapeutically useful in lung cancer. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available