4.6 Article

Occupant behavior in identical residential buildings: A case study for occupancy profiles extraction and application to building performance simulation

Journal

BUILDING SIMULATION
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 1047-1061

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12273-019-0573-x

Keywords

Occupant behavior; identical dwellings; data-mining; occupant behavior profiles

Funding

  1. PIT/VABI
  2. SPARK consortium
  3. TKI EnerGO TRECO-office

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study employs a simplified Knowledge Discovery in Database (KDD) to extract occupancy, equipment and light use profiles from a database referred to 12 all-electric prefabricated dwellings in the Netherlands. The profiles are then integrated into a building performance simulation (BPS) model using the software TRNSYS v17. The significance of the extracted profiles is verified by comparing the total and end-use yearly electricity consumption of the investigated dwellings as predicted by the simulation tool with on-site measurements. For the considered dwellings, using standard OB modeling results in an underestimation of the energy use intensity (EUI) by 5.9% to 42.5%, depending on the case. The integration of the occupant behavior (OB) profiles improves the total electricity consumption prediction from an initial 22.9% average deviation from measurements to 1.7%. The results corroborate that the 1.6x discrepancy observed in the buildings' energy use intensity could be entirely ascribed to OB. Then, the knowledge extracted from the households' database is used to propose a local electricity market framework to reduce the electricity bill and grid dependency of all households. This study confirms the need for appropriate OB modeling in BPS, it shows the potential of the KDD method for successful OB profiles extraction, and is a first example of data-mined OB profiles integration in BPS, as well as of OB profiles deployment for a practical application other than energy use prediction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available