4.8 Article

A Simple Bond-Additivity Model Explains Large Decreases in Heats of Adsorption in Solvents Versus Gas Phase: A Case Study with Phenol on Pt(111) in Water

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages 8116-8127

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01870

Keywords

adsorption energy; aqueous-phase adsorption; solvent effects; aqueous-phase hydrogenation; phenol; platinum

Funding

  1. DOE-OBES Chemical Sciences Division [DE-FG02-96ER14630]
  2. WRF Innovation Fellowship in the Clean Energy Institute
  3. Chemical Transformation Initiative at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) under the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at PNNL
  4. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently reported the low-coverage heat of adsorption of phenol on Pt(111) facets of a Pt wire in aqueous phase to be approximately 21 kJ/mol (relative to aqueous phenol) on the basis of measurements of the adsorption equilibrium constant. This is much smaller than the heat we reported for gas-phase phenol adsorption at this same low coverage on single-crystal Pt(111) under ultrahigh vacuum (200 kJ/mol) on the basis of adsorption calorimetry measurements. Here we quantitatively analyze the individual contributions that give rise to this 179 kJ/mol difference using a simple pairwise bond-additivity model, taking advantage of experimental data from the literature to estimate the bond energies. The dominant contribution to the lowering in heat when phenol is adsorbed in water is the energy cost to break the strong bond of liquid water to Pt(111) (similar to 116 kJ per mole of phenol area). The water-phenol bonding is lost on one face of the phenol, and this costs similar to 50 kJ/mol, but this is nearly compensated by the new water-water bonding (similar to 53 kJ/mol of phenol area). The results indicate that the intrinsic bond energy between phenol and Pt(111) is not very different in the gas versus the aqueous phase, provided one takes into consideration the expectation that water forces phenol into islands of high local coverage even at low average coverage (for the same reason that phenol has limited solubility in water). This also explains the lack of a strong coverage dependence in the heat of adsorption when it is measured in aqueous phase, whereas it decreases by similar to 57 kJ/mol with coverage when it is measured in gas phase. This bond-additivity analysis presented here can be easily generalized to other adsorbates, surfaces, and solvents. It clarifies why catalysis with molecules such as phenol which have very strong bonding to Pt-group metals can proceed rapidly at room temperature in liquid solvents such as water but would never proceed in the gas phase at room temperature due to irreversible site poisoning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available