4.0 Article

Is there justification for 4 cycles of consolidation therapy in AML?

Journal

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 341-344

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2016.10.008

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukemia; AML; CBF; Consolidation; Core binding factor; Genetic landscape; Minimal residual disease; MRD; Mutation status; NPM1; Nucleophosmin 1

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. Novartis
  3. Amgen
  4. Chugai
  5. Celgene
  6. Arog Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia is quite old, dating back to a trial conducted in 1988 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Yet even with more than 20 years of investigation into the optimal number of cycles for consolidation therapy, the answer is still not entirely clear. Dose intensity also has an impact on the number of courses of consolidation therapy administered, as do the cytogenetics of the patients. This review examines how to direct the future of consolidation therapy outside of allogeneic transplantation and discusses the issues to consider in choosing the number of courses of consolidation, including the effect minimal residual disease may have in guiding decisions regarding consolidation treatment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available