4.7 Article

Experimental analysis applied to an evacuated tube solar collector equipped with parabolic concentrator using multilayer graphene-based nanofluids

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 152-160

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.091

Keywords

Multilayer graphene; Nanofluid; Solar collector; Parabolic solar concentrator; Dimensional analysis

Funding

  1. Capes
  2. CNPq
  3. Nacional de Grafite Ltda
  4. Fapemig

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solar collectors are essential to enable the direct use of solar energy. Graphene nanoparticles stand out among other nanoparticles because it presents high thermal conductivity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the thermal efficiency increase achieved applying multilayer graphene (MLG) in low volumetric fractions dispersed in water. An evacuated tube solar collector equipped with parabolic concentrator was herein used in a closed circuit. Thermal efficiency was evaluated considering different recirculating flow rates (6, 24, 42 and 60 L h(-1)), two volumetric fractions of MLG (0.00045% and 0.00068%) with and without concentrator. A semi-empirical equation was developed to estimate thermal efficiency based on hydraulic- and thermal-flow parameters. In relation to the flow rate the best performance was obtained at 42 Lh(-1). Furthermore, the use of the parabolic concentrator increased by approximately 298% the thermal efficiency in comparison to the collector without concentrator. An excellent fit (R-2 = 0.970) was obtained between efficiencies estimated through the semi-empirical equation and those estimated through measurements performed in the current study. MLG nanofluid in concentrations of 0.00045 vol% and 0.00068 vol% increased the thermal efficiency of the solar collector by 31% and 76%, respectively in comparison to the base fluid. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available