4.3 Article

Design of a basigin-mimicking inhibitor targeting the malaria invasion protein RH5

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 187-195

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25786

Keywords

deep sequencing; high-affinity design; host-pathogen interactions; Plasmodium falciparum; Rosetta

Funding

  1. Benoziyo Endowment Fund for the Advancement of Science
  2. European Research Council [815379]
  3. Wellcome [100993/Z/13/Z]
  4. Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship [107366/Z/15/Z]
  5. UK Medical Research Council [MR/K501281/1]
  6. Wellcome Trust [106917/Z/15/Z]
  7. Lister Institute
  8. Wellcome Trust [107366/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many human pathogens use host cell-surface receptors to attach and invade cells. Often, the host-pathogen interaction affinity is low, presenting opportunities to block invasion using a soluble, high-affinity mimic of the host protein. The Plasmodium falciparum reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5 (RH5) provides an exciting candidate for mimicry: it is highly conserved and its moderate affinity binding to the human receptor basigin (K-D >= 1 mu M) is an essential step in erythrocyte invasion by this malaria parasite. We used deep mutational scanning of a soluble fragment of human basigin to systematically characterize point mutations that enhance basigin affinity for RH5 and then used Rosetta to design a variant within the sequence space of affinity-enhancing mutations. The resulting seven-mutation design exhibited 1900-fold higher affinity (K-D approximately 1 nM) for RH5 with a very slow binding off rate (0.23 h(-1)) and reduced the effective Plasmodium growth-inhibitory concentration by at least 10-fold compared to human basigin. The design provides a favorable starting point for engineering on-rate improvements that are likely to be essential to reach therapeutically effective growth inhibition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available