4.8 Article

Unusual dynamics of the divergent malaria parasite PfAct1 actin filament

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1906600116

Keywords

Plasmodium; malaria; actin polymerization; treadmilling; Toxoplasma

Funding

  1. NIH [AI 132378]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gliding motility and host cell invasion by the apicomplexan parasite Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), the causative agent of malaria, is powered by a macromolecular complex called the glideosome that lies between the parasite plasma membrane and the inner membrane complex. The glideosome core consists of a single-headed class XIV myosin PfMyoA and a divergent actin PfAct1. Here we use total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to visualize growth of individual unstabilized PfAct1 filaments as a function of time, an approach not previously used with this actin isoform. Although PfAct1 was thought to be incapable of forming long filaments, filaments grew as long as 30 mu m. Polymerization occurs via a nucleation-elongation mechanism, but with an similar to 4 mu M critical concentration, an order-of-magnitude higher than for skeletal actin. Protomers disassembled from both the barbed and pointed ends of the actin filament with similar fast kinetics of 10 to 15 subunits/s. Rapid treadmilling, where the barbed end of the filament grows and the pointed end shrinks while maintaining an approximately constant filament length, was visualized near the critical concentration. Once ATP has been hydrolyzed to ADP, the filament becomes very unstable, resulting in total dissolution in <40 min. Dynamics at the filament ends are suppressed in the presence of inorganic phosphate or more efficiently by BeFX. A chimeric PfAct1 with a mammalian actin D-loop forms a more stable filament. These unusual dynamic properties distinguish PfAct1 from more canonical actins, and likely contribute to the difficultly in visualizing PfAct1 filaments in the parasite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available