4.6 Article

Experiences, needs, and preferences for follow-up after stroke perceived by people with stroke and healthcare professionals: A focus group study

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223338

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Stroke Association
  2. Swedish state under Swedish government
  3. Swedish state under Swedish county councils, the ALF [71980]
  4. Local Research and Development Board for Gothenburg and Sodra Bohuslan
  5. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  6. Swedish Brain Foundation
  7. Allergan
  8. Hjalmar Svensson's Foundation
  9. Swedish NeuroFoundation (Neuro)
  10. Rune and Ulla Amlov's Foundation
  11. Per-Olof Ahl's Foundation
  12. John and Brit Wennerstrom's Foundation
  13. Swedish Science Council [VR2017-00946]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The aim of this study was to explore the experiences, needs, and preferences regarding follow-up perceived by people with stroke and healthcare professionals. Methods This is a qualitative exploratory study using focus groups. Patients and healthcare professionals, participating in a clinical visit in primary care or specialised care, were purposively sampled. Data were analysed using a framework of analysis developed by Krueger. Results Focus groups were conducted with two patient groups (n = 10, range 45-78 years) and two multidisciplinary healthcare professional groups (n = 8, range 35-55 years). The overarching theme elucidates stroke as a long-term condition requiring complex follow-up. Three organisational themes and six subthemes were identified. People with stroke discovered feelings and changes after returning home. In daily life, problems and feelings of abandonment became evident. Participants expressed experiences of unequal access to health care services. Barriers for accessing appropriate treatment and support included difficulties in communicating one's needs and lack of coherent follow-up. Follow-up activities were well functioning in certain clinics but did not provide continuity over the long term. Participants made suggestions for a comprehensive, planned, and tailored follow-up to meet patient needs. Conclusion Comprehensive long-term follow-up that is accessible to all patients is essential for equal support. Our findings raised awareness about problems discovered after returning home and the obstacles individuals face in communicating their needs. Structured follow-up, which is individually tailored, can empower patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available