4.2 Article

Genetic Associations Between Personality Traits and Lifetime Reproductive Success in Humans

Journal

BEHAVIOR GENETICS
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 742-753

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-016-9803-5

Keywords

Personality; Twins; Fitness; Reproductive success; Natural selection; Breeder's equation

Funding

  1. Kone Foundation
  2. University of Helsinki Research Funds
  3. Academy of Finland [266898, 263278, 292368, 266592]
  4. Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
  5. Royal Society
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [292368, 266898, 292368, 266898] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Personality has been associated with reproductive success in humans and other animals, suggesting potential evolutionary selection pressures. However, studies to date have only examined these associations on a phenotypic level, which may be inadequate in estimating evolutionary change. Using a large longitudinal twin dataset of contemporary Finns, we compared the phenotypic (breeder's equation) and genetically informed (the Robertson-Price identity) associations between lifetime reproductive success (LRS) and two personality traits-neuroticism and extraversion. Neuroticism was not associated with LRS at the phenotypic nor genetic level, while extraversion was associated with higher LRS in men both phenotypically and genetically. Compared to the univariate phenotypic analysis, the genetic analysis suggested a larger selection response of extraversion, and a selection response of neuroticism due to indirect selection. We estimated that neuroticism decreases by .05 standard deviations and extraversion increases by .11 standard deviations by one generation. Our results highlight the importance of considering genetic associations between personality and fitness and investigating several inter-related personality traits and their covariance with each other to predict responses to selection more accurately.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available